Purified wastewater vs conventional drinking water
While purifying municipal wastewater as a potable water supply is considered a sustainable alternative to expand water supplies in drought-prone regions, lingering concerns about health risks have hindered implementation. Now a new Stanford University study, published in Nature Sustainability, indicates that the toxicity of potable reuse waters is equal or lower than conventional drinking waters.
The research team, led by Professor William Mitch, directly compared potable reuse waters and conventional drinking waters serving the same areas using mammalian cell cytotoxicity assays. The cytotoxicity of potable reuse waters treated using reverse osmosis membranes was much lower than that of conventional drinking waters.
The research found that despite its sewage origin, the extensive treatment applied to purify potable reuse waters can produce a safe, energy-efficient and cost-effective alternative water supply.
The findings indicate that a new regulatory approach may be needed to better protect public health.
Sydney Water removes 300,000 kg of stormwater pollution
Sydney Water has removed over 300,000 kg of debris and rubbish from Sydney's waterways to...
SEW Water Saver App recognised as awards finalist
South East Water's Water Saver App has been recognised as a finalist in the Australian Water...
New filter tech targets PFAS in water
Researchers at Monash University have developed a water filtration membrane that effectively...