Powder coating: an unacknowledged waste stream

By Robert Gianello* and Sankar Bhattacharya**
Tuesday, 04 August, 2020

Powder coating: an unacknowledged waste stream

Concerns about the impact of nanoplastics and microplastics (NMPs) on global ecosystems has been on the radar for many years.1 Most attention to date has focused on microplastics in waterways and oceans, but much is unknown about their occurrence on land.2

NMPs contaminate practically all areas of the world including air, soil and water — streams, rivers, oceans and even arctic snow.3 They have been found in seafood, in tap and bottled water collected worldwide, in soils and even in samples of beer and honey.4

Microplastics originate from a multitude of sources such as wear and tear from larger plastic objects, from synthetic fibres in textiles, rubber tyres as they wear down, microbeads, a variety of industrial processes and wastes, and even from direct environmental emission. Their impact and threat to ecosystems has caused alarm and prompted investigations aimed at understanding the extent of the problem.

The numbers are staggering. A study has estimated that European agricultural lands are loaded with between 63,000 and 430,000 tonnes of microplastics per year, with reports of 700–4000 particles/kg soil.5 Another study of European and North American agricultural land puts the number at 110,000 to 730,000 tonnes each year.6

Powder-coated waste: a distinct class of microplastic

Our research suggests the existence of a distinct class of NMPs in landfill that has remained undetected and forgotten about since first manufactured about half a century ago. These particles are a non-toxic waste stream from powder-coat processes and form a distinct class of NMPs.

NMPs from powder coating may have slipped under the radar because they are usually dumped as industrial waste in dedicated areas at landfill sites, with an assumption that significant leakage won’t occur.

The idea that this unique class of NMPs can be stored indefinitely as an industrial waste product because it’s in dedicated landfill sites does not seem justified in light of recent work done on microplastic contamination of the environment.

We draw attention to this waste powder because it exists in large numbers of particles, which don’t readily degrade and probably won’t for centuries under ambient conditions. In addition, containment at landfill sites has likely not been planned for such periods of time — the NMPs are continually generated and dumped year-in year-out, and so accumulate, until, like many other microplastics, they disperse.

It seems reasonable to assume that the NMPs in the waste powder have not been accounted for regarding pollution by microplastics. Once these powder particles escape containment, they will be virtually undetectable.

Microplastics in Australian soil

Currently, little is known about global soils, and even less about microplastic contamination in Australian soils.7

The Monash study is investigating the origin and amount of microplastics in soil, and the effects on soil structure and consequences for biota. Seventeen samples of landfill soil taken from municipal waste facilities in Sydney recorded high values of microplastics, with the highest at 6.75% by weight (ie, 67.5 grams of microplastic in every kg).8

Powder waste has a 40–50% plastic content — the rest is made of fillers and minerals such as titanium dioxide and barium sulfate. Newer forms of powder coating have particle sizes ranging from 2–50 µm. The coating is sprayed onto products then heat-cured to give a paint-like finish. The waste product from this process — known as fines — results from unavoidable overspray that does not stick to the product being sprayed. Fines are essentially microplastics with particle sizes ranging from a few micrometres down to sub-micron or nanometre range.

The powder goes to landfill as a fine powder, or after heat-treating into a solid. Because heating increases the cost of disposal significantly, most operators send their waste to landfill as powder. Global industry estimates suggest that more than 800,000 tonnes of fines were generated in 2020.

There is good reason to believe the durability of powder waste is longer than that of other microplastics that go to landfill, which can be in the order of centuries. This durability comes from being engineered to withstand harsh environments. There is no reason to believe that NMPs from the powder-coating process will not leak from landfill in the same ways as other microplastics, as leachates to nearby soils and waterways further downstream.

To determine how many particles could be in 800,000 tonnes of waste, we made estimates for two NMP particle sizes: 1 µm and 0.1 µm.

For 1 µm-sized particles, 800,000 tonnes contained 5 x 1023 particles (the number 5 followed by 23 zeros). For 0.1 µm particles the number was 5 x 1026 particles.

Resource recovery

Our research is exploring a method of recovering resources from powder-coating waste streams. Based on the collaborative work between Planex and Monash University, we conclude that the waste stream can be a concentrated source of titanium dioxide, rivalling the quality of that obtained from the ores ilmenite and rutile. Australian mining and production of titanium dioxide from these ores has inherent problems, such as the intense need for water, electricity and CO2 emissions. Along with two other industry partners, Planex and Monash are embarking on a detailed investigation of a low-emission process.


  1. SAPEA (2019), Science Advice for Policy by European Academies.
  2. Rillig MC (2012) Microplastic in Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Soil? Environ Sci Technol. 46:6453-6454.
  3. Katz C (2019), https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/08/microplastics-found-in-arctic-snow/.
  4. The Lancet Planetary Health (2017) Microplastics and human health – an urgent problem. 1 (7), e254.
  5. Boots B, Russell CW, Green DS (2019)://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304.
  6. Nizzetto L (2018) https://www.niva.no/en/news/microplastics-in-agricultural-soils-a-reason-to-worry.
  7. Bryce A, McBratney A, Minasmy B, Field D, Cattle S (2018), The Conversation, May 21.
  8. Fuller S, Gautam A (2016), Environ Sci Technol 50:5774−5780.

*Robert Gianello, PhD is Research Manager at Planex Sales Pty Ltd.

**Professor Sankar Bhattacharya works in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Monash University.

Related Articles

Aligning recycling and manufacturing in the COVID era

The UNSW SMaRT Centre is helping to align recycling and manufacturing in the new COVID-19 era to...

Microrecycling science: revolutionising recycling and manufacturing

UNSW's SMaRT Centre has developed a ‘material microsurgery' technique that can...

Creating cost-effective waste reduction solutions

Tips for delivering cost-effective waste reduction solutions to businesses, from George Tsiamis...

  • All content Copyright © 2020 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd