Bacteria break down toxic chemicals in groundwater

Tuesday, 12 May, 2015

Bacteria break down toxic chemicals in groundwater

University of New South Wales (UNSW) researchers have improved a standard remediation practice in order to speed up the degradation of toxic industrial chemicals in contaminated groundwater. Their research has been published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

Groundwater remediation is currently a long and costly process, explained study co-author Associate Professor Mike Manefield. At the Botany Industrial Park, for example, chloroform and dichloroethane were released into the groundwater during the mid-twentieth century. The current custodians of the site have since installed a $167 million groundwater treatment plant that is not only energy-intensive to run and costly to maintain, but it will need to be in operation for “around 200-300 years”, according to Manefield.

Manefield and his team have now isolated three types of naturally occurring bacteria, including Dehalobacter, which can break down chlorinated solvents such as chloroform. He explained, “We take samples from the contaminated environment, which contain billions of different bacteria, and we bring them back to the lab, and we incubate them under specific conditions that favour the organisms that can actually break down these compounds.”

Once the bacteria have been grown, they are brought back to the site and injected under nitrogen pressure into contaminated aquifers. “It colonises the aquifer in large numbers and starts consuming the compound, the pollutant,” Manefield said. “Once it’s finished consuming the compound, then it dies off.”

The researchers have now combined their technique with another approach to remediation - the installation of a reactive iron barrier, which breaks down chemicals as the contaminated groundwater flows through it. In a laboratory study, Manefield and his colleagues showed that chloroform was broken down eight times faster when a culture of Dehalobacter bacteria was added to reactive iron, compared with just iron alone.

“Some people favour the iron barrier, some favour the bugs,” said study co-author Dr Matthew Lee. “But our research shows that combining them could be the best solution.”

Image credit: ©freeimages.com/profile/barrysmith

Related Products

eWater Systems sustainable cleaning and sanitising system

eWater Systems are designed to replace chemicals by supplying disinfectant, sanitiser and cleaner...

Stormtech Wave Grate anodised aluminium solution

The Stormtech Wave Grate is an anodised aluminium solution designed and manufactured in...

AMS Water Metering Qalcosonic W1 Australian Utility Version

The Qalcosonic W1 Australian Utility Version smart ultrasonic water meter is now fully certified...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd