Creating the right energy mix for small communities


Friday, 13 December, 2019


Creating the right energy mix for small communities

Representatives of smaller communities are overwhelmed by a huge amount of information regarding emerging energy technologies, which tends to exacerbate existing uncertainty. A new online tool from Fraunhofer is now helping to clarify this confusion, calculating the optimal energy mix for each individual case — including funding possibilities available.

The transition to a new energy economy is imminent. However, representatives of small communities are often unable to envision exactly what is the best solution for them due to missing resources and knowhow. Solar power, photovoltaics or geothermal? What is suitable for a community and what percentage could each technology contribute to the community’s energy needs? Are there any funding opportunities available?

Researchers of the Advanced System Technology Branch of the Fraunhofer Institute for Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB-AST have developed a software tool which analyses the needs and opportunities for a specific community. The optimisation tool is one of the major outcomes of the project ‘Technological and Economic Energy Modeling — modTRAIL’.

“With our project, mayors of smaller communities can learn about technical possibilities available for the transition into a new energy economy and corresponding opportunities for funding — and the information they receive is tailored specifically to their community,” said Liane Rublack, a scientist at Fraunhofer IOBS-AST. “The tool uses a mixture of conventional and renewable energy sources to calculate the optimised solution for the heat and electricity generation of the community.”

In four model municipalities located in the German federal state of Thuringia with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants — namely Kahla, Werther, Neumark and Großobringen — the researchers are already testing the tool. First the decision-makers in the communities have to insert the name of their municipality, whereupon they receive details about the electricity and heating demand in their locality. Afterwards, they specify their preferences for future power and heating supply. What technologies would they like to use and which ones would they prefer to rule out? There are numerous options to choose from, including solar and wind power, battery and thermal storage units, condensing oil and gas boilers, air heat pumps and geothermal heat pumps.

The tool also elicits the decision-makers’ preferences regarding other factors. Is minimising CO2 the top priority? Or are the costs of purchasing the energy more important? Based on this prioritisation, the software tool determines the mixture of energy and power plants. For example, this might be a combination of photovoltaic plants, battery and thermal storage systems, and combined heat and power plants. The output also includes the costs for installation and operation, the energy procurement costs, the amount of CO2 emissions and the funding possibilities available.

“With our optimisation tool, we want to start the process and show the mayors of small communities the potential offered by renewable energy sources for their municipalities,” Rublack said.

The researchers used standard load profiles for households as well as the time series for renewable energy sources recorded by the German Meteorological Service — in this case, by the Thuringia weather station at Erfurt-Weimar — for their software tool. For communities in Thuringia with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants, the necessary data is already stored in the system. The tool can also be used in other German states with the corresponding data.

The developed optimisation model is an integral part of the online software of the ‘Transformation in Rural Areas’ (TRAIL) joint research project. The specific goal of the project is to motivate a large number of smaller communities to engage fully with the questions of efficient energy supply with the help of the easy-to-use optimisation tool. In particular, it lowers the barriers for the communities to start, which are due to limited human and financial resources.

An online software tool was developed which generates initial statements about electricity and heating consumption of the community chiefly based on publicly available GIS data and census data and further existing databases. Furthermore, the optimisation part generates recommendations for the energy transition procedure of the specific community.

Image caption: Visualisation of heating demand for the municipality of Neumark (486 inhabitants) in a 100 x 100 m grid. Dark colours indicate high energy demand. The results were estimated based on the building structures. Image ©Open Data Thüringen | virtualcitySYSTEMS | Layout: Daniel Cebulla (JENA-GEOS-Ingenieurbüro).

Related Articles

Heat recovery could save money and the environment

Up to 96% of the drive energy supplied to a compressor is available for reuse — this is...

Dirty dancing across a new energy landscape

The real-time balancing of electricity generation (supply) and demand is like a dynamic dance and...

Digitising Australia's buildings is key to tackling net zero

Businesses around the world are continuing to focus on net zero, and building construction and...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd